Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameEllesmerePonte Vecchio
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23047168
Core clock speed1243 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0694.4
Floating-point processing power5.728 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz1200 MBps
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2017 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

Pro Duo Polaris has 20% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and Data Center GPU Max 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Duo Polaris is a workstation graphics card while Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.