GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon RX 6500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500M with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.35
+57.5%

RX 6500M outperforms GTX 1630 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking254363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.88
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 24TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Current priceno data$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Boost clock speed2191 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate153.657.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6500M and GeForce GTX 1630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500M 20.35
+57.5%
GTX 1630 12.92

Radeon RX 6500M outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6500M 7859
+57.5%
GTX 1630 4991

Radeon RX 6500M outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 57% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+51.5%
66
−51.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+53.2%
62
−53.2%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+49.3%
67
−49.3%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+57.4%
50−55
−57.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
Hitman 3 95−100
+55.7%
61
−55.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+50%
80−85
−50%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+47.1%
65−70
−47.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+54.5%
55−60
−54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 170−180
+49.1%
114
−49.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+57.1%
70
−57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+55.6%
45
−55.6%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+49.3%
65−70
−49.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+56.3%
32
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+57.4%
50−55
−57.4%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
Hitman 3 75−80
+50%
50
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+50%
80−85
−50%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+47.1%
65−70
−47.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+54.5%
55−60
−54.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+47.4%
95
−47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+49.1%
57
−49.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+55.7%
60−65
−55.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+55.2%
29
−55.2%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+52.2%
90−95
−52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+50%
80−85
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+56.6%
83
−56.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+53.8%
39
−53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+40%
25
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+54.5%
55−60
−54.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+53.8%
35−40
−53.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+53.8%
24−27
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+47.1%
30−35
−47.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+50%
40−45
−50%
Hitman 3 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+54.8%
40−45
−54.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+44.7%
35−40
−44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+54.8%
40−45
−54.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+47.1%
30−35
−47.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Hitman 3 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+42.9%
27−30
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

This is how RX 6500M and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500M is 77% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.35 12.92
Recency 4 January 2022 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 6500M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 462 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1163 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.