Arc A580 vs Radeon RX 6500M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500M with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
20.18

Arc A580 outperforms RX 6500M by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking276182
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Power efficiency27.8512.22
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)10 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10243072
Core clock speed2000 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate153.6384.0
Floating-point processing power4.915 TFLOPS12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Cores1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500M 20.18
Arc A580 31.00
+53.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500M 7758
Arc A580 11918
+53.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6500M 17889
Arc A580 35210
+96.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6500M 52161
Arc A580 95677
+83.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500M 14018
Arc A580 27574
+96.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500M 88601
Arc A580 113974
+28.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
−66.1%
103
+66.1%
1440p35−40
−57.1%
55
+57.1%
4K21−24
−57.1%
33
+57.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
−118%
98
+118%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−51.5%
100−105
+51.5%
Elden Ring 65
−24.6%
81
+24.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−113%
83
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Forza Horizon 4 114
−126%
258
+126%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−148%
134
+148%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−39.1%
60−65
+39.1%
Valorant 101
−22.8%
120−130
+22.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Counter-Strike 2 28
−164%
74
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−50%
24−27
+50%
Dota 2 80
−7.5%
86
+7.5%
Elden Ring 55
−90.9%
100−110
+90.9%
Far Cry 5 35
−80%
63
+80%
Fortnite 100−110
−36.4%
140−150
+36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95
−125%
214
+125%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
−24.6%
86
+24.6%
Metro Exodus 19
−411%
97
+411%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−31.6%
170−180
+31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−39.1%
60−65
+39.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−62.5%
100−110
+62.5%
Valorant 57
−118%
120−130
+118%
World of Tanks 230−240
−18%
270−280
+18%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−40.6%
90−95
+40.6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−86.1%
67
+86.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−40%
21−24
+40%
Dota 2 95
−47.4%
140−150
+47.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−28.4%
85−90
+28.4%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−113%
177
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
−31.6%
170−180
+31.6%
Valorant 80−85
−51.2%
120−130
+51.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
−15.6%
37
+15.6%
Elden Ring 30−35
−70.6%
55−60
+70.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−12.1%
37
+12.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−1.7%
170−180
+1.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
World of Tanks 130−140
−46%
200−210
+46%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−48.8%
60−65
+48.8%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−159%
44
+159%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−74.5%
95−100
+74.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−150%
130
+150%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−97.8%
91
+97.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−96.4%
55
+96.4%
Valorant 50−55
−71.2%
85−90
+71.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−11.8%
19
+11.8%
Dota 2 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%
Elden Ring 14−16
−80%
27−30
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−147%
37
+147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
−59%
95−100
+59%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−11.8%
38
+11.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−70%
30−35
+70%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−65.4%
40−45
+65.4%
Fortnite 24−27
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−143%
73
+143%
Valorant 24−27
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%

This is how RX 6500M and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 66% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 57% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 57% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A580 is 411% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A580 surpassed RX 6500M in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.18 31.00
Recency 4 January 2022 10 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 175 Watt

RX 6500M has 250% lower power consumption.

Arc A580, on the other hand, has a 53.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500M is a notebook card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 526 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 317 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.