Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in the ranking	220	624
Place by popularity	83	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	57.53	no data
Power efficiency	15.91	14.01
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 24	DG1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	31 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	768
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	79.20
Floating-point processing power	5.765 TFLOPS	2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	24
TMUs	64	48
Ray Tracing Cores	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2248 MHz	2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	68.26 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.83
+386%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 5.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 XT 9570
+386%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6500 XT 22954
+179%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 8214

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500 XT 15712
+148%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 91909
+148%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 36993

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 356129
+101%

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 177442

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	62 +130%	27 −130%
1440p	28 +64.7%	17 −64.7%
4K	16 +6.7%	15 −6.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.21	no data
1440p	7.11	no data
4K	12.44	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
+300%

18−20

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +100%	27−30 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 +168%	19 −168%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +125%	35−40 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +200%	18−20 −200%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +111%	27−30 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +90.8%	75−80 −90.8%
Hitman 3	50−55 +108%	24 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +86.9%	60−65 −86.9%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +49.1%	57 −49.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +93.9%	33 −93.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +127%	35−40 −127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +51.5%	65−70 −51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +100%	27−30 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +617%	6 −617%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +125%	35−40 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +111%	27−30 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +90.8%	75−80 −90.8%
Hitman 3	50−55 +117%	23 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +86.9%	60−65 −86.9%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +97.7%	43 −97.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +100%	30−35 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 +224%	33 −224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +82.8%	27−30 −82.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +51.5%	65−70 −51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +100%	27−30 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	21−24 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +111%	27−30 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +90.8%	75−80 −90.8%
Hitman 3	50−55 +138%	21 −138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 +254%	26 −254%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +186%	29 −186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +200%	18 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 −172%	65−70 +172%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+156%

−156%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +114%	21−24 −114%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +136%	10−12 −136%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 +188%	8−9 −188%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +183%	6−7 −183%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +115%	12−14 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +161%	50−55 −161%
Hitman 3	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 +187%	21−24 −187%
Metro Exodus	57 +217%	18−20 −217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 +180%	20 −180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +94.4%	70−75 −94.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+116%

18−20

−116%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +118%	10−12 −118%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Hitman 3	10 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +144%	50−55 −144%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +155%	11 −155%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +20%	5−6 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +127%	14−16 −127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 +127%	11 −127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +150%	4−5 −150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+90.9%

10−12

−90.9%

This is how RX 6500 XT and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 130% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 65% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 617% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Iris Xe MAX Graphics is 172% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is ahead in 71 test (99%)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.83	5.11
Recency	19 January 2022	31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	25 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 385.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has 328% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.