GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in performance ranking	205	198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	71
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.90	no data
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Navi 24	GN20-P1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	10 May 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$274 (1.4x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2560
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	1222 MHz
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	180.2	118.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6500 XT and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.2
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.60

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 25.01
+1.7%

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6500 XT by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6500 XT 22954
+27.1%

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by 27% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 15712
+17.6%

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by 18% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 91909
+26%

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by 26% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 6500 XT 356129

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 422757
+18.7%

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6500 XT by 19% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65 −15.4%	75 +15.4%
1440p	30 −40%	42 +40%
4K	16 −62.5%	26 +62.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
+16.1%

−16.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 −17.6%	60 +17.6%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −35%	108 +35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −9.3%	59 +9.3%
Far Cry 5	102 +29.1%	79 −29.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	97 +15.5%	84 −15.5%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Hitman 3	70−75 −41.9%	105 +41.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	76 +16.9%	65 −16.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −90%	76 +90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85 −11.8%	95 +11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 +25.4%	59 −25.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +22.9%	35 −22.9%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −22.5%	98 +22.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 −32.4%	45 +32.4%
Far Cry 5	92 +24.3%	74 −24.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	89 +8.5%	82 −8.5%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Hitman 3	70−75 −20.3%	89 +20.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	58 +3.6%	56 −3.6%
Metro Exodus	52 −9.6%	57 +9.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +2.6%	39 −2.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 −16.9%	76 +16.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	92 +0%	92 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	58 +5.5%	55 −5.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +19.2%	26 −19.2%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −11.3%	89 +11.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −33.3%	40 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	86 +26.5%	68 −26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +12.3%	73 −12.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +8%	50 −8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 −12%	28 +12%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Hitman 3	40−45 −51.2%	62 +51.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 −23.8%	52 +23.8%
Metro Exodus	18 −88.9%	34 +88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 −22.2%	44 +22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 −13%	26 +13%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −25.5%	69 +25.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 −29.4%	22 +29.4%
Far Cry 5	57 +14%	50 −14%
Far Cry New Dawn	57 −5.3%	60 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −2%	50−55 +2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 −5.3%	20 +5.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 −43.5%	33 +43.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	11 −90.9%	21 +90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −18.8%	19 +18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 −3.6%	29 +3.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 −133%	14−16 +133%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −31%	38 +31%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 −150%	10 +150%
Far Cry 5	23 +9.5%	21 −9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 −40%	28 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +0%	10 +0%

This is how RX 6500 XT and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 15.4% faster than RX 6500 XT in 1080p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 40% faster than RX 6500 XT in 1440p
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 62.5% faster than RX 6500 XT in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 29.1% faster than the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 150% faster than the RX 6500 XT.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is ahead in 17 tests (25%)
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 40 tests (59%)
there's a draw in 11 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.60	25.01
Recency	19 January 2022	10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	60 Watt