RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6400

Place in performance ranking	269	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	12.46	no data
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Navi 24	Ada Lovelace
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$159	$6,799
Current price	$376 (2.4x MSRP)	$9290 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6400 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	18176
Core clock speed	no data	915 MHz
Boost clock speed	2321 MHz	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	53 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	111.4	1,423

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	8.9
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 bit Bit
Memory clock speed	16 GB/s	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6400 19.55

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 73.87
+278%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 6400 by 278% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6400 7551

RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28527
+278%

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms Radeon RX 6400 by 278% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50−55 −288%	194 +288%
1440p	40−45 −303%	161 +303%
4K	30−35 −293%	118 +293%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −297%	110−120 +297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −337%	130−140 +337%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −297%	230−240 +297%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −300%	120−130 +300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −293%	110−120 +293%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −304%	180−190 +304%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −280%	220−230 +280%
Hitman 3	30−33 −310%	120−130 +310%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −290%	300−350 +290%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −317%	140−150 +317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −313%	120−130 +313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −287%	300−350 +287%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −294%	130−140 +294%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −297%	110−120 +297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −337%	130−140 +337%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −297%	230−240 +297%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −300%	120−130 +300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −293%	110−120 +293%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −304%	180−190 +304%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −280%	220−230 +280%
Hitman 3	30−33 −310%	120−130 +310%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −290%	300−350 +290%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −293%	55 +293%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −313%	120−130 +313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −287%	300−350 +287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 −308%	489 +308%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −294%	130−140 +294%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −297%	110−120 +297%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −337%	130−140 +337%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −300%	120−130 +300%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −293%	110−120 +293%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −280%	220−230 +280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −290%	300−350 +290%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 −287%	300−350 +287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 −300%	260 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −294%	130−140 +294%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
−313%

120−130

+313%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −315%	160−170 +315%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −311%	140−150 +311%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −319%	85−90 +319%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −292%	90−95 +292%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −293%	118 +293%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −304%	180−190 +304%
Hitman 3	27−30 −300%	100−110 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −284%	190−200 +284%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −313%	99 +313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −291%	210−220 +291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 −298%	219 +298%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −300%	80−85 +300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
−297%

110−120

+297%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −319%	85−90 +319%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −283%	65−70 +283%
Hitman 3	16−18 −313%	65−70 +313%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −284%	173 +284%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −327%	128 +327%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −309%	184 +309%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −288%	60−65 +288%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −321%	55−60 +321%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −333%	50−55 +333%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −283%	130−140 +283%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −287%	110−120 +287%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −308%	98 +308%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −308%	45−50 +308%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−295%

80−85
+295%

This is how RX 6400 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 288% faster in 1080p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 303% faster in 1440p
RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 293% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.55	73.87
Recency	19 January 2022	3 December 2022
Cost	$159	$6799
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	53 Watt	300 Watt