UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Radeon RX 6300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6300M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6300M
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
15.35
+128%

6300M outperforms Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.74no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76864
Core clock speed2000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2400 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate115.2no data
Floating-point processing power3.686 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data
Ray Tracing Cores12no data
L0 Cache192 KBno data
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data
L3 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width32 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+114%
21
−114%
1440p24−27
+118%
11
−118%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+83.3%
18
−83.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+70.6%
17
−70.6%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+120%
15
−120%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+183%
18
−183%
Fortnite 85−90
+107%
40−45
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+110%
30−35
−110%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+96%
25
−96%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+142%
12
−142%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+132%
24−27
−132%
Valorant 120−130
+71.6%
70−75
−71.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+159%
30−35
−159%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+84.7%
110−120
−84.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
Dota 2 95−100
+83%
53
−83%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+168%
19
−168%
Fortnite 85−90
+107%
40−45
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+110%
30−35
−110%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+123%
22
−123%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+392%
12
−392%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+132%
24−27
−132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+82.6%
23
−82.6%
Valorant 120−130
+71.6%
70−75
−71.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+123%
30−33
−123%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+136%
14−16
−136%
Dota 2 95−100
+98%
49
−98%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+183%
18
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+110%
30−35
−110%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+132%
24−27
−132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+282%
11
−282%
Valorant 120−130
+477%
22
−477%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+107%
40−45
−107%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+117%
50−55
−117%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+333%
6
−333%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+280%
40−45
−280%
Valorant 150−160
+104%
75−80
−104%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+238%
12−14
−238%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+143%
14
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+138%
16−18
−138%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Valorant 85−90
+149%
35−40
−149%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 55−60
+124%
24−27
−124%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%

This is how RX 6300M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300M is 114% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6300M is 118% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6300M surpassed UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.35 6.74
Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm

RX 6300M has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 526 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6300M or UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.