GeForce GTX 1630 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in performance ranking	206	363
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.92	12.59
Architecture	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 24	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	28 June 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$274 (1.4x MSRP)	$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6500 XT has 82% better value for money than GTX 1630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	512
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	57.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.60
+91.1%

GTX 1630 12.87

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 91% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6500 XT 9521
+91.2%

GTX 1630 4980

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1630 by 91% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65 +117%	30−35 −117%
1440p	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
4K	16 +100%	8−9 −100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
+106%

35−40

−106%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 +113%	24−27 −113%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +100%	40−45 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +100%	27−30 −100%
Far Cry 5	102 +104%	50−55 −104%
Far Cry New Dawn	97 +94%	50−55 −94%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +105%	40−45 −105%
Hitman 3	70−75 +111%	35−40 −111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	76 +117%	35−40 −117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +122%	18−20 −122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85 +113%	40−45 −113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 +111%	35−40 −111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +105%	21−24 −105%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +100%	40−45 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +113%	16−18 −113%
Far Cry 5	92 +104%	45−50 −104%
Far Cry New Dawn	89 +97.8%	45−50 −97.8%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +105%	40−45 −105%
Hitman 3	70−75 +111%	35−40 −111%
Horizon Zero Dawn	58 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%
Metro Exodus	52 +92.6%	27−30 −92.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +122%	18−20 −122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65 +117%	30−33 −117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	92 +104%	45−50 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	58 +93.3%	30−33 −93.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +104%	24−27 −104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +93.8%	16−18 −93.8%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +100%	40−45 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +114%	14−16 −114%
Far Cry 5	86 +115%	40−45 −115%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +105%	40−45 −105%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +105%	40−45 −105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +100%	27−30 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +108%	12−14 −108%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +111%	18−20 −111%
Hitman 3	40−45 +95.2%	21−24 −95.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +100%	21−24 −100%
Metro Exodus	18 +100%	9−10 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	36 +100%	18−20 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +104%	27−30 −104%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +113%	8−9 −113%
Far Cry 5	57 +111%	27−30 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	57 +111%	27−30 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +111%	9−10 −111%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Hitman 3	21−24 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Metro Exodus	11 +120%	5−6 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +100%	8−9 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +100%	14−16 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +100%	3−4 −100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +107%	14−16 −107%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	23 +91.7%	12−14 −91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +100%	10−11 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +100%	5−6 −100%

This is how RX 6500 XT and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 117% faster than GTX 1630 in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 114% faster than GTX 1630 in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 100% faster than GTX 1630 in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.60	12.87
Recency	19 January 2022	28 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	75 Watt