RTX A1000 Embedded vs Radeon RX 590

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 590 with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

RX 590
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 175 Watt
24.34

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms RX 590 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking228190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.32no data
Power efficiency9.6158.20
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 30GA107S
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date15 November 2018 (6 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1469 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate222.572.96
Floating-point processing power7.119 TFLOPS4.669 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs14464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 590 24.34
RTX A1000 Embedded 29.47
+21.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 590 9389
RTX A1000 Embedded 11368
+21.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
−11.1%
110−120
+11.1%
1440p56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
4K36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.82no data
1440p4.98no data
4K7.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
−15.4%
75−80
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 86
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Battlefield 5 136
−17.6%
160−170
+17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
−15.9%
80−85
+15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 90
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 90
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 274
−9.5%
300−310
+9.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 301
−16.3%
350−400
+16.3%
Metro Exodus 124
−21%
150−160
+21%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
−14.3%
160−170
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 272
−10.3%
300−310
+10.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 113
−15%
130−140
+15%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%
Battlefield 5 122
−14.8%
140−150
+14.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 64
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 74
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
−19.7%
85−90
+19.7%
Forza Horizon 4 259
−15.8%
300−310
+15.8%
Hitman 3 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 287
−4.5%
300−310
+4.5%
Metro Exodus 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
−14.9%
85−90
+14.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−14%
130−140
+14%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−13.2%
60−65
+13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 261
−14.9%
300−310
+14.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
−21%
75−80
+21%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 55
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 91
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Hitman 3 45−50
−12.2%
55−60
+12.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 96
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100
−20%
120−130
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 64
−17.2%
75−80
+17.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−18.2%
65−70
+18.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−15.1%
160−170
+15.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
−20.7%
35−40
+20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Metro Exodus 58
−20.7%
70−75
+20.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
−14.3%
80−85
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
−18.2%
240−250
+18.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−15.4%
45−50
+15.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−14%
65−70
+14%
Metro Exodus 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
−19%
50−55
+19%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
−20%
24−27
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%

This is how RX 590 and RTX A1000 Embedded compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 11% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 16% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 Embedded is 11% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.34 29.47
Recency 15 November 2018 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 35 Watt

RX 590 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A1000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 590 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 590 is a desktop card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
RTX A1000 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2445 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 16 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.