FireGL 9700 X1-256p vs Radeon RX 590 GME

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2006)
GPU code namePolaris 20R300
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 March 2020 (4 years ago)1 July 2002 (21 year ago)
Current price$1163 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speedno data324 MHz
Boost clock speed1420 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate204.52.592

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s552 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s17.66 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 March 2020 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 37 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 590 GME and FireGL 9700 X1-256p. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 590 GME is a desktop card while FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Radeon RX 590 GME
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
FireGL 9700 X1-256p

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 431 vote

Rate Radeon RX 590 GME on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.