GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Radeon RX 580

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 and GeForce GTX 460 768MB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 580
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 185 Watt
23.01
+427%

RX 580 outperforms GTX 460 768MB by a whopping 427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking245674
Place by popularity1not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.16no data
Power efficiency8.58no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 20no data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304336
Core clock speed1257 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)185 Wattno data
Texture fill rate193.0no data
Floating-point processing power6.175 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 23.01
+427%
GTX 460 768MB 4.37

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 580 19274
+586%
GTX 460 768MB 2811

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 580 44344
+262%
GTX 460 768MB 12262

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 13927
+566%
GTX 460 768MB 2092

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 82516
+369%
GTX 460 768MB 17589

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 580 348952
+162%
GTX 460 768MB 133103

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96
+118%
44
−118%
1440p44
+450%
8−9
−450%
4K38
+443%
7−8
−443%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data
1440p5.20no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+250%
12−14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Elden Ring 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+515%
12−14
−515%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+250%
12−14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+421%
18−20
−421%
Metro Exodus 83
+730%
10−11
−730%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+264%
14−16
−264%
Valorant 90−95
+933%
9−10
−933%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+800%
12−14
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+250%
12−14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Dota 2 51
+410%
10
−410%
Elden Ring 75−80
+650%
10−11
−650%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+232%
21−24
−232%
Fortnite 110−120
+372%
24−27
−372%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+421%
18−20
−421%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+413%
15
−413%
Metro Exodus 57
+470%
10−11
−470%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+432%
35−40
−432%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+264%
14−16
−264%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+393%
14−16
−393%
Valorant 90−95
+933%
9−10
−933%
World of Tanks 240−250
+241%
70−75
−241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+423%
12−14
−423%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+250%
12−14
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Dota 2 80−85
+471%
14−16
−471%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+232%
21−24
−232%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+421%
18−20
−421%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70
+84.2%
35−40
−84.2%
Valorant 90−95
+933%
9−10
−933%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
Elden Ring 40−45
+700%
5−6
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+480%
30−33
−480%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
World of Tanks 150−160
+397%
30−35
−397%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+683%
6−7
−683%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+550%
10−11
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1100%
5−6
−1100%
Metro Exodus 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Valorant 60−65
+408%
12−14
−408%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Dota 2 57
+256%
16−18
−256%
Elden Ring 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+256%
16−18
−256%
Metro Exodus 18
+500%
3−4
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 73
+508%
12−14
−508%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+256%
16−18
−256%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+600%
4−5
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+500%
5−6
−500%
Fortnite 31
+933%
3−4
−933%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Valorant 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%

This is how RX 580 and GTX 460 768MB compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 is 118% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 is 450% faster in 1440p
  • RX 580 is 443% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 580 is 2550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 580 surpassed GTX 460 768MB in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.01 4.37

RX 580 has a 426.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 460 768MB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580
Radeon RX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 20397 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 768MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.