HD Graphics 3000 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile and HD Graphics 3000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
580 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 2882% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 338 | 1255 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.03 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.87 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Generation 6.0 (2011) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 20 | Sandy Bridge GT2+ |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 1 February 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $301.69 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1077 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 1,160 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | unknown |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 15.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.963 TFLOPS | 0.2496 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 2 |
| TMUs | 144 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 77
+756%
| 9
−756%
|
| 4K | 30
+2900%
| 1−2
−2900%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.92 | no data |
| 4K | 10.06 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3800%
|
1−2
−3800%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+3750%
|
2−3
−3750%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3800%
|
1−2
−3800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 183
+2950%
|
6−7
−2950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+1400%
|
5−6
−1400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 69
+763%
|
8−9
−763%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+404%
|
27−30
−404%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+3750%
|
2−3
−3750%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+1955%
|
11
−1955%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3800%
|
1−2
−3800%
|
| Dota 2 | 76
+850%
|
8
−850%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 81
+3950%
|
2−3
−3950%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+1400%
|
5−6
−1400%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
+5700%
|
1−2
−5700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 62
+3000%
|
2−3
−3000%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+3800%
|
1−2
−3800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 57
+613%
|
8−9
−613%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68
+1260%
|
5−6
−1260%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+404%
|
27−30
−404%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+3750%
|
2−3
−3750%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+3800%
|
1−2
−3800%
|
| Dota 2 | 69
+886%
|
7
−886%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+1400%
|
5−6
−1400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35−40
+600%
|
5−6
−600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 41
+413%
|
8−9
−413%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
+640%
|
5−6
−640%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+404%
|
27−30
−404%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 60
+2900%
|
2−3
−2900%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+4367%
|
3−4
−4367%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
+2700%
|
6−7
−2700%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+3400%
|
5−6
−3400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+5100%
|
1−2
−5100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+4000%
|
1−2
−4000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+2200%
|
2−3
−2200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+2700%
|
1−2
−2700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+4100%
|
1−2
−4100%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+143%
|
14−16
−143%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+3100%
|
2−3
−3100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+3100%
|
1−2
−3100%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
This is how RX 580 Mobile and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:
- RX 580 Mobile is 756% faster in 1080p
- RX 580 Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 580 Mobile is 4367% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 580 Mobile surpassed HD Graphics 3000 in all 33 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.89 | 0.60 |
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 1 February 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
RX 580 Mobile has a 2881.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
