GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile and GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5070 Mobile outperforms RX 580 Mobile by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 318 | 82 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.78 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.49 | 69.11 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 20 | GB206 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) | April 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $301.69 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1077 MHz | 1425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 21,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 205.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.963 TFLOPS | 13.13 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 77
−147%
| 190−200
+147%
|
| 4K | 30
−150%
| 75−80
+150%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 3.92 | no data |
| 4K | 10.06 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−146%
|
150−160
+146%
|
| Fortnite | 183
−146%
|
450−500
+146%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−153%
|
190−200
+153%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−141%
|
140−150
+141%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 69
−146%
|
170−180
+146%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−150%
|
350−400
+150%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
−148%
|
260−270
+148%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
−142%
|
550−600
+142%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Dota 2 | 76
−150%
|
190−200
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−146%
|
150−160
+146%
|
| Fortnite | 81
−147%
|
200−210
+147%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−153%
|
190−200
+153%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−141%
|
140−150
+141%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 62
−142%
|
150−160
+142%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 57
−146%
|
140−150
+146%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 68
−150%
|
170−180
+150%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−150%
|
350−400
+150%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
−147%
|
190−200
+147%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−144%
|
95−100
+144%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 70−75
−143%
|
180−190
+143%
|
| Dota 2 | 69
−146%
|
170−180
+146%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
−146%
|
150−160
+146%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
−153%
|
190−200
+153%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 41
−144%
|
100−105
+144%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−143%
|
90−95
+143%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
−150%
|
350−400
+150%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 60
−150%
|
150−160
+150%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
−150%
|
95−100
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
−124%
|
300−310
+124%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−142%
|
75−80
+142%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−150%
|
60−65
+150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
−137%
|
400−450
+137%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
−156%
|
450−500
+156%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
−150%
|
130−140
+150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−135%
|
40−45
+135%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 30−35
−150%
|
80−85
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
−144%
|
100−105
+144%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
−139%
|
110−120
+139%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
−141%
|
70−75
+141%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 40−45
−138%
|
100−105
+138%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−142%
|
80−85
+142%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
−133%
|
35−40
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
−150%
|
60−65
+150%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
−150%
|
260−270
+150%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−150%
|
70−75
+150%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−129%
|
16−18
+129%
|
| Dead Island 2 | 18−20
−150%
|
45−50
+150%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
−150%
|
160−170
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−138%
|
50−55
+138%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−150%
|
80−85
+150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14
−150%
|
35−40
+150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 18−20
−137%
|
45−50
+137%
|
This is how RX 580 Mobile and RTX 5070 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5070 Mobile is 147% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5070 Mobile is 150% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.02 | 48.73 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX 5070 Mobile has a 156.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 580 Mobile in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
