H3C XG310 vs Radeon RX 580 2048SP

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking274not rated
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Power efficiency9.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 20DG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2018 (6 years ago)11 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed1168 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1284 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate164.452.80
Floating-point processing power5.259 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs12848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2018 11 November 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

RX 580 2048SP has 100% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 2048SP and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Intel H3C XG310
H3C XG310

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3061 vote

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.