Arc A370M vs Radeon RX 5700

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 with Arc A370M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
36.00
+181%

RX 5700 outperforms Arc A370M by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126387
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.13no data
Power efficiency14.3126.17
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 10DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1465 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate248.499.20
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length268 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5700 36.00
+181%
Arc A370M 12.80

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14386
+181%
Arc A370M 5115

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 5700 31470
+160%
Arc A370M 12090

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 5700 23746
+191%
Arc A370M 8149

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 5700 132911
+273%
Arc A370M 35604

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+205%
38
−205%
1440p70
+233%
21
−233%
4K43
+7.5%
40
−7.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.01no data
1440p4.99no data
4K8.12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 82
+242%
24−27
−242%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+82.6%
46
−82.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 92
+114%
40−45
−114%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+179%
24−27
−179%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+289%
19
−289%
Forza Horizon 4 214
+189%
74
−189%
Forza Horizon 5 126
+260%
35−40
−260%
Metro Exodus 148
+300%
35−40
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+242%
30−35
−242%
Valorant 182
+243%
50−55
−243%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 176
+309%
40−45
−309%
Counter-Strike 2 57
+138%
24−27
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+385%
13
−385%
Dota 2 143
+240%
42
−240%
Far Cry 5 77
+221%
24
−221%
Fortnite 160−170
+121%
75−80
−121%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+182%
62
−182%
Forza Horizon 5 97
+177%
35−40
−177%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+372%
29
−372%
Metro Exodus 102
+685%
13
−685%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 215
+119%
95−100
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+78.8%
30−35
−78.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+228%
40−45
−228%
Valorant 100
+88.7%
50−55
−88.7%
World of Tanks 270−280
+56.7%
170−180
−56.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+86%
40−45
−86%
Counter-Strike 2 50
+108%
24−27
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+400%
11
−400%
Dota 2 146
+121%
66
−121%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+86.3%
50−55
−86.3%
Forza Horizon 4 155
+192%
53
−192%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+169%
35−40
−169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+101%
95−100
−101%
Valorant 160
+202%
50−55
−202%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 72
+555%
11
−555%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+555%
11
−555%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+208%
12−14
−208%
World of Tanks 230−240
+153%
90−95
−153%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+189%
27−30
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 32
+191%
10−12
−191%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+290%
30−35
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 108
+192%
37
−192%
Forza Horizon 5 64
+205%
21−24
−205%
Metro Exodus 94
+236%
27−30
−236%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+256%
18−20
−256%
Valorant 110
+233%
30−35
−233%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 25
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Dota 2 72
+200%
24−27
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+200%
24−27
−200%
Metro Exodus 31
+244%
9−10
−244%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132
+238%
35−40
−238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+200%
24−27
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Dota 2 100
+150%
40
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+224%
16−18
−224%
Fortnite 50−55
+247%
14−16
−247%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+256%
18−20
−256%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+240%
10−11
−240%
Valorant 56
+300%
14−16
−300%

This is how RX 5700 and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 205% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 233% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700 is 685% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5700 surpassed Arc A370M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.00 12.80
Recency 7 July 2019 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 35 Watt

RX 5700 has a 181.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 414.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1873 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 167 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.