Quadro NVS 160M vs Radeon RX 570

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 570 with Quadro NVS 160M, including specs and performance data.

RX 570
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.59
+4772%

RX 570 outperforms NVS 160M by a whopping 4772% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3221298
Place by popularity17not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.61no data
Power efficiency10.282.11
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 20G98
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed1168 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1244 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate159.24.640
Floating-point processing power5.095 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-I
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 570 15.59
+4772%
NVS 160M 0.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 570 6967
+4841%
NVS 160M 141

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
1440p480−1
4K300−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.99no data
1440p3.52no data
4K5.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+8700%
1−2
−8700%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Far Cry 5 77
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Fortnite 238
+5850%
4−5
−5850%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+3233%
3−4
−3233%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Valorant 130−140
+408%
24−27
−408%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+7400%
1−2
−7400%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+9600%
1−2
−9600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+1436%
14−16
−1436%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Dota 2 100−110
+910%
10−11
−910%
Far Cry 5 70
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Fortnite 95
+9400%
1−2
−9400%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+7200%
1−2
−7200%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
Metro Exodus 43 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 87
+1143%
7−8
−1143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+1440%
5−6
−1440%
Valorant 130−140
+408%
24−27
−408%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Dota 2 100−110
+910%
10−11
−910%
Far Cry 5 65
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+886%
7−8
−886%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
Valorant 130−140
+408%
24−27
−408%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 25 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+5267%
3−4
−5267%
Valorant 160−170
+5433%
3−4
−5433%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 46
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 16 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 0−1
Valorant 95−100
+4650%
2−3
−4650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Far Cry 5 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 39 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23
+1050%
2−3
−1050%

This is how RX 570 and NVS 160M compete in popular games:

  • RX 570 is 8400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 570 is 5800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 570 surpassed NVS 160M in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.59 0.32
Recency 18 April 2017 15 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 12 Watt

RX 570 has a 4771.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 160M, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 160M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 160M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Quadro NVS 160M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 8721 vote

Rate Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 570 or Quadro NVS 160M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.