Quadro 2000 vs Radeon RX 570

#ad 
Buy
Radeon RX 570 Radeon RX 570X Radeon RX 580 Radeon RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580X Radeon RX 590 GME
VS
#ad 
Buy
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000D Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4100 Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Quadro 7000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 570 with Quadro 2000, including specs and performance data.

RX 570
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
15.59
+635%

RX 570 outperforms 2000 by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 570 RX 570
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking322854
Place by popularity17not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.660.15
Power efficiency10.302.71
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code namePolaris 20GF106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)24 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 570 has 8340% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048192
Core clock speed1168 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1244 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt62 Watt
Texture fill rate159.220.00
Floating-point processing power5.095 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs12832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm178 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 570 15.59
+635%
Quadro 2000 2.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 570 6967
+636%
Quadro 2000 947

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 570 31978
+724%
Quadro 2000 3880

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+750%
10−12
−750%
1440p48
+700%
6−7
−700%
4K30
+650%
4−5
−650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.99
+2913%
59.90
−2913%
1440p3.52
+2736%
99.83
−2736%
4K5.63
+2558%
149.75
−2558%
  • RX 570 has 2913% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 570 has 2736% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 570 has 2558% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+780%
10−11
−780%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Far Cry 5 77
+670%
10−11
−670%
Fortnite 238
+693%
30−33
−693%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+733%
12−14
−733%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+671%
7−8
−671%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+700%
12−14
−700%
Valorant 130−140
+725%
16−18
−725%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+650%
10−11
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+708%
12−14
−708%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+696%
27−30
−696%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Dota 2 100−110
+742%
12−14
−742%
Far Cry 5 70
+678%
9−10
−678%
Fortnite 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+683%
12−14
−683%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+671%
7−8
−671%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+711%
9−10
−711%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Metro Exodus 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 87
+770%
10−11
−770%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+670%
10−11
−670%
Valorant 130−140
+725%
16−18
−725%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+656%
9−10
−656%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Dota 2 100−110
+742%
12−14
−742%
Far Cry 5 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+650%
10−11
−650%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69
+667%
9−10
−667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
Valorant 130−140
+725%
16−18
−725%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+700%
9−10
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+675%
16−18
−675%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Metro Exodus 25
+733%
3−4
−733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+667%
21−24
−667%
Valorant 160−170
+690%
21−24
−690%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+643%
7−8
−643%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 46
+667%
6−7
−667%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+638%
8−9
−638%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+650%
6−7
−650%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Metro Exodus 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+833%
3−4
−833%
Valorant 95−100
+692%
12−14
−692%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+675%
4−5
−675%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 0−1
Dota 2 55−60
+638%
8−9
−638%
Far Cry 5 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+680%
5−6
−680%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27
+800%
3−4
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 23
+667%
3−4
−667%

This is how RX 570 and Quadro 2000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 570 is 750% faster in 1080p
  • RX 570 is 700% faster in 1440p
  • RX 570 is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.59 2.12
Recency 18 April 2017 24 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 62 Watt

RX 570 has a 635.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 2000, on the other hand, has 93.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 is a desktop card while Quadro 2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570
NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 570 Radeon RX 570
vs
RTX 3050 4 GB GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
Quadro CX Quadro CX
RX 570 Radeon RX 570
vs
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
8400 GS GeForce 8400 GS
vs
RX 570 570
8600 GT GeForce 8600 GT
vs
RX 570 570
FX 5200 NVIDIA FX 5200
vs
RX 570 570
GeForce2 MX 400 NVIDIA MX 400
vs
RX 570 570
Stream Processor Stream Processor
vs
RX 570 570
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 570 570
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
vs
RX 570 570
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
RX 570 570
FX 4800 NVIDIA FX 4800
vs
RX 570 570
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
vs
RX 570 570

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 8718 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 320 votes

Rate Quadro 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 570 or Quadro 2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.