Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon RX 570 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.58
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameEllesmereG71
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 December 2017 (6 years ago)22 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599.99 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed926 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate154.49.000
Floating-point processing power4.94 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs12820

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data173 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz660 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s42.24 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 December 2017 22 May 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 80 Watt

RX 570 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

FX 3500, on the other hand, has 6.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 570 Mobile and Quadro FX 3500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 570 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro FX 3500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 570 Mobile
Radeon RX 570 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500
Quadro FX 3500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 570 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.