Radeon HD 6790 vs RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT and Radeon HD 6790, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.39
+747%

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by a whopping 747% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking133649
Place by popularity100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.420.34
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 10Barts
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)4 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $149
Current price$94 (0.3x MSRP)$184 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 6494% better value for money than HD 6790.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304800
Core clock speed1235 MHz840 MHz
Boost clock speed1750 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate224.633.60
Floating-point performanceno data1,344.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm198 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s134.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.39
+747%
HD 6790 4.18

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by 747% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5600 XT 13667
+746%
HD 6790 1616

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by 746% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5600 XT 31310
+985%
HD 6790 2887

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by 985% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 5600 XT 86004
+531%
HD 6790 13637

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by 531% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 5600 XT 22058
+926%
HD 6790 2150

RX 5600 XT outperforms HD 6790 by 926% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p400−450
+669%
52
−669%
Full HD104
+82.5%
57
−82.5%
1440p60
+757%
7−8
−757%
4K34
+750%
4−5
−750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 74 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 185 no data
Hitman 3 83 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 213 no data
Metro Exodus 144 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 112 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 104 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76 no data
Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 63 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 79 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 272 no data
Metro Exodus 133 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 101 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 248 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 54 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 138 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 115 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 84 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45
+800%
5−6
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30 no data
Far Cry 5 89 no data
Forza Horizon 4 109 no data
Hitman 3 52 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 89 no data
Metro Exodus 88 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+870%
10−11
−870%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 21 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 36 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+820%
5−6
−820%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 54 no data
Metro Exodus 46 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 11 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 39 no data

This is how RX 5600 XT and HD 6790 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 669% faster in 900p
  • RX 5600 XT is 82% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 757% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600 XT is 750% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.39 4.18
Recency 21 January 2020 4 April 2011
Cost $279 $149
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6790 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 6790

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2397 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 153 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.