Quadro FX 3000G vs Radeon RX 560 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	388	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.02	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code name	Polaris 11	NV35
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	5 January 2017 (7 years ago)	22 July 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99.99	no data
Current price	$468 (4.7x MSRP)	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	1175 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1275 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	135 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	58.97	3.200
Floating-point performance	2,462 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560 Mobile and Quadro FX 3000G compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 8x
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	850 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	27.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	9.0a
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.5 (2.1)
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	5 January 2017	22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	130 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---