Tegra K1 GPU vs Radeon RX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.82no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 14GK20A
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 October 2019 (6 years ago)15 October 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408192
Core clock speedno data756 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate162.47.608
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs888
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-1.1
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 15 October 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 8 Watt

RX 5500 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 1275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 is a desktop graphics card while Tegra K1 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 274 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 or Tegra K1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.