Tegra K1 GPU vs Radeon RX 5500 XT
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 296 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 79 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 34.74 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 12.85 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 | GK20A |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2019 (6 years ago) | 15 October 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1408 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 756 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1845 MHz | 951 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 162.4 | 7.608 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.196 TFLOPS | 0.3652 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 4 |
| TMUs | 88 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | IGP |
| Length | 180 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | ES 3.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1 |
| CUDA | - | 3.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 December 2019 | 15 October 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 8 Watt |
RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 1525% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop graphics card while Tegra K1 GPU is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
