T400 vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile

Place in the ranking	559	474
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	4.47	no data
Power efficiency	9.64	21.59
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Lexa	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 July 2017 (7 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	384
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	420 MHz
Boost clock speed	1287 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	51.48	34.20
Floating-point processing power	1.647 TFLOPS	1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

3x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−20%

18−21
+20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.33

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 −20%	12−14 +20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	7 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	28 −25%	35−40 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	13 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Valorant	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	4 −25%	5−6 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Dota 2	27 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Far Cry 5	29 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Fortnite	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	24 −25%	30−33 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −31.6%	75−80 +31.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Valorant	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
World of Tanks	100−110 −29.6%	140−150 +29.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Counter-Strike 2	3 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Dota 2	43 −27.9%	55−60 +27.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 5	8 −25%	10−11 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −31.6%	75−80 +31.6%
Valorant	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
World of Tanks	50−55 −30%	65−70 +30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Valorant	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Fortnite	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Valorant	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%

This is how RX 550 Mobile and T400 compete in popular games:

T400 is 20% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.99	9.39
Recency	2 July 2017	6 May 2021
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	30 Watt

T400 has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The T400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 Mobile is a notebook card while T400 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.