GeForce GTX 570M vs Radeon RX 550 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 550 Mobile and GeForce GTX 570M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 550 Mobile outperforms GTX 570M by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 603 | 687 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.47 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 9.81 | 4.55 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | Lexa | GF114 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2017 (8 years ago) | 28 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1287 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,200 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 51.48 | 32.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.647 TFLOPS | 0.7728 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24 |
| TMUs | 40 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 384 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 72.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| 3D Blu-Ray | - | + |
| 3D Gaming | - | + |
| Optimus | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 50−55
+35.1%
| 37
−35.1%
|
| Full HD | 16
−231%
| 53
+231%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 5.00 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+60%
|
20−22
−60%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 13
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 38
+90%
|
20−22
−90%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+28.6%
|
14−16
−28.6%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 13
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7
−42.9%
|
10−11
+42.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+33.3%
|
18−20
−33.3%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+24.1%
|
55−60
−24.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+35.4%
|
75−80
−35.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 45
+15.4%
|
35−40
−15.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+7.1%
|
14−16
−7.1%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18
+20%
|
14−16
−20%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4
−125%
|
9−10
+125%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+33.3%
|
18−20
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
+30.8%
|
12−14
−30.8%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+24.1%
|
55−60
−24.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+55.6%
|
18−20
−55.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 43
+10.3%
|
35−40
−10.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 13
−7.7%
|
14−16
+7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+38.1%
|
21−24
−38.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+33.3%
|
18−20
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24
+84.6%
|
12−14
−84.6%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+24.1%
|
55−60
−24.1%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 40−45
+48.1%
|
27−30
−48.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+33.3%
|
9−10
−33.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
+42.9%
|
35−40
−42.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+18.2%
|
30−35
−18.2%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
+49%
|
45−50
−49%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+36.4%
|
10−12
−36.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
+40%
|
5−6
−40%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+5.9%
|
16−18
−5.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+43.5%
|
21−24
−43.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+53.3%
|
14−16
−53.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
This is how RX 550 Mobile and GTX 570M compete in popular games:
- RX 550 Mobile is 35% faster in 900p
- GTX 570M is 231% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 550 Mobile is 400% faster.
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 570M is 125% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 550 Mobile performs better in 55 tests (92%)
- GTX 570M performs better in 5 tests (8%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.10 | 4.24 |
| Recency | 2 July 2017 | 28 June 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
RX 550 Mobile has a 43.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 550 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 570M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
