Radeon Pro W5500M vs RX 5300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5300M with Radeon Pro W5500M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5300M
2019
3 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
12.00
+42.5%

RX 5300M outperforms Pro W5500M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking396489
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.417.30
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 14Navi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081408
Core clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1445 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate127.2127.6
Floating-point processing power4.069 TFLOPS4.083 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5300M 12.00
+42.5%
Pro W5500M 8.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5300M 4947
+42.6%
Pro W5500M 3469

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Metro Exodus 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Valorant 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Dota 2 76
+52%
50−55
−52%
Far Cry 5 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Fortnite 70−75
+46%
50−55
−46%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+60%
40−45
−60%
Metro Exodus 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+60%
10−11
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Valorant 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
World of Tanks 170−180
+45%
120−130
−45%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Dota 2 95
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Valorant 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+49.2%
65−70
−49.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
World of Tanks 90−95
+51.7%
60−65
−51.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Valorant 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Dota 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Fortnite 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

This is how RX 5300M and Pro W5500M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5300M is 53% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.00 8.42
Recency 13 November 2019 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB

RX 5300M has a 42.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro W5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Radeon RX 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W5500M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.