H800 SXM5 vs Radeon RX 5300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.62no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 14GH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140816896
Core clock speed1327 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate144.8926.6
Floating-point processing power4.632 TFLOPS59.3 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs88528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB80 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.0 GB/s1,681 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 700 Watt

RX 5300 has 600% lower power consumption.

H800 SXM5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 2566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300 and H800 SXM5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop card while H800 SXM5 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
NVIDIA H800 SXM5
H800 SXM5

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate H800 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.