Radeon HD 7870 vs RX 480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 480 and Radeon HD 7870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 480
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
22.33
+85.8%

RX 480 outperforms HD 7870 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking230376
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.412.82
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 10 EllesmerePitcairn XT
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (8 years ago)5 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $412.83
Current price$174 (0.8x MSRP)$200 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 480 has 305% better value for money than HD 7870.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041280
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million2800 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate182.380.00
Floating-point performance5,834 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Eyefinity1+
HDMI2.0+
DisplayPort support1.4HDRno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/ano data
CrossFire1no data
Enduron/ano data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync+no data
HD3Dn/ano data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune+no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudion/ano data
ZeroCore+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantlen/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 480 22.33
+85.8%
HD 7870 12.02

RX 480 outperforms HD 7870 by 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 480 8624
+85.9%
HD 7870 4640

RX 480 outperforms HD 7870 by 86% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 480 17919
+189%
HD 7870 6194

RX 480 outperforms HD 7870 by 189% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 480 39552
+85.3%
HD 7870 21348

RX 480 outperforms HD 7870 by 85% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p150−160
+78.6%
84
−78.6%
Full HD82
+13.9%
72
−13.9%
1440p57
+90%
30−35
−90%
4K36
+100%
18−20
−100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 93 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 48 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Metro Exodus 39 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 77 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 21 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 15 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 26 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

This is how RX 480 and HD 7870 compete in popular games:

  • RX 480 is 79% faster in 900p
  • RX 480 is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RX 480 is 90% faster in 1440p
  • RX 480 is 100% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.33 12.02
Recency 29 June 2016 5 March 2012
Cost $229 $412.83
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 175 Watt

The Radeon RX 480 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1662 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 586 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.