Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX 470

Place in performance ranking	243	420
Place by popularity	53	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.32	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 10 Pro	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2016 (7 years ago)	15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	no data
Current price	$14.08 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	96
Core clock speed	926 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,700 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	154.4	no data
Floating-point performance	4,940 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 470 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	6600 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 20.96
+113%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 9.85

Radeon RX 470 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by 113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 470 11885
+138%

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000

Radeon RX 470 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by 138% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	72 +140%	30−35 −140%
1440p	41 +128%	18−20 −128%
4K	39 +117%	18−20 −117%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35
+136%

14−16

−136%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Battlefield 5	65−70	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Hitman 3	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	70−75 +133%	30−33 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	105	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +130%	27−30 −130%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Battlefield 5	65−70	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Hitman 3	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85	no data
Metro Exodus	34	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	88	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +130%	27−30 −130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +125%	16−18 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +139%	18−20 −139%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +136%	14−16 −136%
Far Cry 5	45−50	no data
Forza Horizon 4	90−95	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	74 +147%	30−33 −147%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 +123%	30−33 −123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +130%	27−30 −130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+138%

24−27

−138%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +122%	18−20 −122%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +133%	18−20 −133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry 5	43	no data
Forza Horizon 4	40−45	no data
Hitman 3	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	53 +121%	24−27 −121%
Metro Exodus	46 +119%	21−24 −119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 +143%	21−24 −143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+119%

16−18

−119%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Hitman 3	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +120%	5−6 −120%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	10−12	no data
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +130%	10−11 −130%
Metro Exodus	24 +140%	10−11 −140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+125%

8−9
−125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +121%	14−16 −121%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +133%	12−14 −133%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%