RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 470

Place in the ranking	261	73
Place by popularity	47	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.90	83.51
Power efficiency	12.00	45.42
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	AD107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2016 (8 years ago)	12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has 367% better value for money than RX 470.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2816
Core clock speed	926 MHz	1620 MHz
Boost clock speed	1206 MHz	2130 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	154.4	187.4
Floating-point processing power	4.94 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	128	88
Tensor Cores	no data	88
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	241 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1650 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	211.2 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.02

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.40
+121%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096

RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17876
+121%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	72 −108%	150−160 +108%
1440p	38 −111%	80−85 +111%
4K	35 −114%	75−80 +114%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.49	4.33
1440p	4.71	8.11
4K	5.11	8.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−112%

70−75
+112%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −117%	150−160 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −109%	90−95 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −104%	100−105 +104%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −119%	280−290 +119%
Hitman 3	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −120%	220−230 +120%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −108%	150−160 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	102 −116%	220−230 +116%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −113%	200−210 +113%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −117%	150−160 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −109%	90−95 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −104%	100−105 +104%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −119%	280−290 +119%
Hitman 3	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −120%	220−230 +120%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −108%	150−160 +108%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	88 −116%	190−200 +116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −113%	100−105 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −113%	200−210 +113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −117%	100−105 +117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −109%	90−95 +109%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −104%	100−105 +104%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −119%	280−290 +119%
Hitman 3	40−45 −120%	90−95 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	74 −116%	160−170 +116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	67 −109%	140−150 +109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40 −113%	85−90 +113%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 −113%	200−210 +113%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−114%

120−130

+114%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −113%	85−90 +113%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −119%	70−75 +119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −111%	40−45 +111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −120%	260−270 +120%
Hitman 3	24−27 −120%	55−60 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	53 −108%	110−120 +108%
Metro Exodus	46 −117%	100−105 +117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 −116%	110−120 +116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −108%	50−55 +108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −120%	270−280 +120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−114%

75−80
+114%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −114%	45−50 +114%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Hitman 3	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −113%	230−240 +113%
Metro Exodus	21−24 −117%	50−55 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −118%	24−27 +118%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −107%	60−65 +107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 −120%	55−60 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−94.4%

35−40
+94.4%

This is how RX 470 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 108% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 111% faster in 1440p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 114% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.02	46.40
Recency	4 August 2016	12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 120.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.