Tesla P40 vs Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with Tesla P40, including specs and performance data.
P40 outperforms 470 Mobile by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 360 | 227 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.63 | 1.04 |
| Power efficiency | 14.81 | 8.67 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Ellesmere | GP102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 13 September 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549.99 | $5,699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
RX 470 Mobile has 249% better value for money than Tesla P40.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 3840 |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz | 1303 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1074 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 11,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 137.5 | 367.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.399 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 8-pin EPS |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1808 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 347.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
−70.2%
|
160−170
+70.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−69%
|
120−130
+69%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
−70.2%
|
160−170
+70.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
−61.8%
|
110−120
+61.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
−64.8%
|
150−160
+64.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
−59.4%
|
110−120
+59.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
−63.5%
|
85−90
+63.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−66.7%
|
220−230
+66.7%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−69%
|
120−130
+69%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
−70.2%
|
160−170
+70.2%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220
−64.3%
|
350−400
+64.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
−68.3%
|
170−180
+68.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
−61.8%
|
110−120
+61.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| Fortnite | 90−95
−64.8%
|
150−160
+64.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
−59.4%
|
110−120
+59.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55
−63.5%
|
85−90
+63.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
−58.7%
|
100−105
+58.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−66.7%
|
75−80
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−66.7%
|
220−230
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75
−69%
|
120−130
+69%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
−68.3%
|
170−180
+68.3%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 65−70
−61.8%
|
110−120
+61.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60
−63.6%
|
90−95
+63.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
−59.4%
|
110−120
+59.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 60−65
−61.3%
|
100−105
+61.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
−66.7%
|
75−80
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
−66.7%
|
220−230
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 90−95
−64.8%
|
150−160
+64.8%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−66.7%
|
55−60
+66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
−72.1%
|
210−220
+72.1%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
−60.7%
|
45−50
+60.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−66.7%
|
35−40
+66.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170
−68.8%
|
270−280
+68.8%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
−70.7%
|
280−290
+70.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
−70.2%
|
80−85
+70.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−60%
|
24−27
+60%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40
−71.4%
|
60−65
+71.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−62.2%
|
60−65
+62.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−70.7%
|
70−75
+70.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−60%
|
40−45
+60%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
−71.1%
|
65−70
+71.1%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−71.4%
|
24−27
+71.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
−61.3%
|
50−55
+61.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−61.5%
|
21−24
+61.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−66.7%
|
40−45
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−72%
|
160−170
+72%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−60%
|
40−45
+60%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−71.4%
|
24−27
+71.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 55−60
−69.5%
|
100−105
+69.5%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−66.7%
|
30−33
+66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−55.2%
|
45−50
+55.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−68.8%
|
27−30
+68.8%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
−58.8%
|
27−30
+58.8%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.25 | 27.98 |
| Recency | 4 August 2016 | 13 September 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
RX 470 Mobile has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 194.1% lower power consumption.
Tesla P40, on the other hand, has a 72.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
The Tesla P40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P40 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
