Radeon RX 6900 vs RX 470 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 Mobile with Radeon RX 6900, including specs and performance data.

RX 470 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 85 Watt
18.23

RX 6900 outperforms RX 470 Mobile by a whopping 281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.13no data
Power efficiency14.8018.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameEllesmereNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484608
Core clock speed926 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1074 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate137.5606.2
Floating-point processing power4.399 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Elden Ring 55−60
−268%
210−220
+268%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−279%
220−230
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%
Valorant 70−75
−270%
270−280
+270%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−279%
220−230
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Dota 2 65−70
−269%
240−250
+269%
Elden Ring 55−60
−268%
210−220
+268%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−281%
240−250
+281%
Fortnite 95−100
−257%
350−400
+257%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−275%
240−250
+275%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−267%
180−190
+267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−260%
450−500
+260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−272%
160−170
+272%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−268%
210−220
+268%
Valorant 70−75
−270%
270−280
+270%
World of Tanks 220−230
−264%
800−850
+264%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−279%
220−230
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−275%
120−130
+275%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
−261%
130−140
+261%
Dota 2 65−70
−269%
240−250
+269%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−281%
240−250
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−268%
280−290
+268%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−260%
450−500
+260%
Valorant 70−75
−270%
270−280
+270%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
Elden Ring 30−33
−267%
110−120
+267%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−257%
100−105
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−264%
600−650
+264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−275%
60−65
+275%
World of Tanks 120−130
−260%
450−500
+260%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−278%
140−150
+278%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−262%
170−180
+262%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−266%
150−160
+266%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−275%
90−95
+275%
Valorant 45−50
−270%
170−180
+270%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Dota 2 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Elden Ring 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−246%
45−50
+246%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−270%
200−210
+270%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Dota 2 30−35
−255%
110−120
+255%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−270%
85−90
+270%
Fortnite 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−270%
100−105
+270%
Valorant 21−24
−281%
80−85
+281%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.23 69.54
Recency 4 August 2016 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 255 Watt

RX 470 Mobile has 200% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 281.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 470 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 470 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470 Mobile
Radeon RX 470 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 32 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 82 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.