Radeon R5 430 OEM vs RX 460

Place in performance ranking	400	775
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.25	no data
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT	Oland
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 August 2016 (7 years ago)	30 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data
Current price	$397 (4.6x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	384
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	780 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.20	18.72
Floating-point performance	2,150 gflops	599.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	170 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	4600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	36.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 10.60
+298%

R5 430 OEM 2.66

RX 460 outperforms R5 430 OEM by 298% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 460 4101
+298%

R5 430 OEM 1031

RX 460 outperforms R5 430 OEM by 298% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	42 +320%	10−12 −320%
1440p	96 +300%	24−27 −300%
4K	20 +300%	5−6 −300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

+300%

4−5
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	34 +325%	8−9 −325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +300%	7−8 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	40 +300%	10−11 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +310%	10−11 −310%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +307%	14−16 −307%
Hitman 3	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Red Dead Redemption 2	34 +325%	8−9 −325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	34 +325%	8−9 −325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 +300%	7−8 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	37 +311%	9−10 −311%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +322%	9−10 −322%
Forza Horizon 4	54 +350%	12−14 −350%
Hitman 3	27−30 +350%	6−7 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Metro Exodus	21 +320%	5−6 −320%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	28 +300%	7−8 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 +311%	9−10 −311%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 +325%	4−5 −325%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +300%	9−10 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Far Cry 5	34 +325%	8−9 −325%
Far Cry New Dawn	35 +338%	8−9 −338%
Forza Horizon 4	41 +310%	10−11 −310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 +360%	5−6 −360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +400%	3−4 −400%
Hitman 3	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Hitman 3	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 +300%	3−4 −300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	11 +450%	2−3 −450%
Far Cry New Dawn	12 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

This is how RX 460 and R5 430 OEM compete in popular games:

RX 460 is 320% faster in 1080p
RX 460 is 300% faster in 1440p
RX 460 is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.60	2.66
Recency	8 August 2016	30 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt