FirePro W2100 vs Radeon RX 460

Place in the ranking	435	851
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.12	no data
Power efficiency	9.79	6.22
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Baffin	Oland
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	8 August 2016 (8 years ago)	12 August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	320
Core clock speed	1090 MHz	630 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	680 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	26 Watt
Texture fill rate	67.20	13.60
Floating-point processing power	2.15 TFLOPS	0.4352 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	56	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	170 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Form factor	no data	low profile / half length
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort count	no data	2
Dual-link DVI support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	+
FreeSync	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 10.26
+354%

FirePro W2100 2.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 460 4102
+354%

FirePro W2100 903

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 460 5701
+425%

FirePro W2100 1085

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 460 34892
+349%

FirePro W2100 7771

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40 +208%	13 −208%
1440p	70 +400%	14−16 −400%
4K	21 +950%	2 −950%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.15	no data
1440p	1.23	no data
4K	4.10	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Metro Exodus	41 +1267%	3−4 −1267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Valorant	40−45	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Dota 2	24 +380%	5−6 −380%
Far Cry 5	44 +214%	14−16 −214%
Fortnite	60−65 +417%	12−14 −417%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Grand Theft Auto V	35 +483%	6−7 −483%
Metro Exodus	27 +800%	3−4 −800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	51 +132%	21−24 −132%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +256%	9−10 −256%
Valorant	40−45	0−1
World of Tanks	150−160 +243%	40−45 −243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	33 +560%	5−6 −560%
Counter-Strike 2	10 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Dota 2	35−40 +660%	5−6 −660%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +207%	14−16 −207%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +258%	12−14 −258%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	28 +27.3%	21−24 −27.3%
Valorant	40−45	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
World of Tanks	75−80 +407%	14−16 −407%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Valorant	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Dota 2	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	32 +357%	7−8 −357%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +40%	14−16 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Fortnite	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9	0−1
Valorant	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%

This is how RX 460 and FirePro W2100 compete in popular games:

RX 460 is 208% faster in 1080p
RX 460 is 400% faster in 1440p
RX 460 is 950% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 460 is 2600% faster.
in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 10% faster.

All in all, in popular games: