Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 460 Mobile
2016, $86
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
9.37

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms 460 Mobile by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking506454
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.12no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameBaffinno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 August 2016 (9 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89632
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1180 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate66.08no data
Floating-point processing power2.115 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs56no data
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 460 Mobile 9.37
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 11.62
+24%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 460 Mobile 7793
+6.5%
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 7317

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 460 Mobile 5108
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 7025
+37.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 460 Mobile 31294
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 41422
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+6.1%
33
−6.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.46no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.8%
50−55
+23.8%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−22.6%
35−40
+22.6%
Fortnite 55−60
−21.1%
65−70
+21.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−24.1%
35−40
+24.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−26.5%
40−45
+26.5%
Valorant 90−95
−15.2%
100−110
+15.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.8%
50−55
+23.8%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−17.4%
160−170
+17.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Dota 2 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−22.6%
35−40
+22.6%
Fortnite 55−60
−21.1%
65−70
+21.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−24.1%
35−40
+24.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−5.7%
37
+5.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−26.5%
40−45
+26.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Valorant 90−95
−15.2%
100−110
+15.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−23.8%
50−55
+23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Dota 2 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−22.6%
35−40
+22.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−26.5%
40−45
+26.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−82.4%
30−35
+82.4%
Valorant 90−95
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−21.1%
65−70
+21.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−23.6%
85−90
+23.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Valorant 100−110
−20%
120−130
+20%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−21.7%
27−30
+21.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
−25%
24−27
+25%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Valorant 50−55
−26%
60−65
+26%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%

This is how RX 460 Mobile and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 Mobile is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 82% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU surpassed RX 460 Mobile in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.37 11.62
Recency 8 August 2016 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 24% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 460 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 17 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 460 Mobile or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.