A100 SXM4 vs Radeon R9 Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking308not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.76no data
Power efficiency8.93no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameFijiGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date27 August 2015 (10 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40966912
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,900 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate256.0609.1
Floating-point processing power8.192 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs64160
TMUs256432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache1 MB20.3 MB
L2 Cache2 MB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)HBM2E
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.140
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2015 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 400 Watt

R9 Nano has 129% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 Nano and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Nano is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 Nano or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.