GeForce GTX 750 vs GTX 980 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce GTX 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.89
+313%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms GTX 750 by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138498
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.194.52
Power efficiency9.9110.89
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGM200GM107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 Ti has 214% better value for money than GTX 750.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816512
Core clock speed1000 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data95 °C
Texture fill rate189.434.72
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPS1.111 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs17632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s5.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor support4 displays3 displays
HDMI++
HDCP++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
3D Vision Live-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.89
+313%
GTX 750 8.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 980 Ti 13798
+313%
GTX 750 3338

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+327%
GTX 750 3970

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 980 Ti 42988
+364%
GTX 750 9266

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 980 Ti 52856
+519%
GTX 750 8534

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 980 Ti 35714
+242%
GTX 750 10448

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 980 Ti 126
+350%
GTX 750 28

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+371%
21−24
−371%
1440p51
+325%
12−14
−325%
4K53
+342%
12−14
−342%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.56
−15.7%
5.67
+15.7%
1440p12.73
−28.3%
9.92
+28.3%
4K12.25
−23.5%
9.92
+23.5%
  • GTX 750 has 16% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 750 has 28% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 750 has 23% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+356%
16−18
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Elden Ring 120−130
+359%
27−30
−359%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+356%
16−18
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+325%
40−45
−325%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Valorant 140−150
+377%
30−33
−377%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+371%
21−24
−371%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+356%
16−18
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Dota 2 23
+360%
5−6
−360%
Elden Ring 120−130
+359%
27−30
−359%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Fortnite 160−170
+360%
35−40
−360%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+325%
40−45
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+325%
8−9
−325%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+319%
21−24
−319%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+329%
45−50
−329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+317%
12−14
−317%
Valorant 140−150
+377%
30−33
−377%
World of Tanks 270−280
+329%
65−70
−329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 73
+356%
16−18
−356%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+356%
16−18
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Dota 2 110−120
+326%
27−30
−326%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+343%
21−24
−343%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+325%
40−45
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+329%
45−50
−329%
Valorant 140−150
+377%
30−33
−377%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+364%
14−16
−364%
Elden Ring 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+371%
14−16
−371%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+338%
40−45
−338%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
World of Tanks 220−230
+315%
55−60
−315%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+326%
27−30
−326%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+325%
24−27
−325%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+339%
18−20
−339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+329%
14−16
−329%
Valorant 100−110
+354%
24−27
−354%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Dota 2 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
Elden Ring 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+322%
27−30
−322%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+339%
18−20
−339%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Dota 2 132
+340%
30−33
−340%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+333%
12−14
−333%
Fortnite 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+314%
14−16
−314%
Valorant 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and GTX 750 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 371% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 325% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 342% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.89 8.68
Recency 2 June 2015 18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has a 313.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 750, on the other hand, has 354.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GeForce GTX 750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1616 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2365 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.