RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M485X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M485X with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

R9 M485X
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.43

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms R9 M485X by a whopping 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking47318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.47
Power efficiency2.6316.94
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAmethystAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204818176
Core clock speed723 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate92.541,423
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs128568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M485X 9.43
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 72.65
+670%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M485X 3660
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28188
+670%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−692%
190
+692%
1440p18−21
−789%
160
+789%
4K14−16
−721%
115
+721%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data35.78
1440pno data42.49
4Kno data59.12

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−811%
164
+811%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−277%
110−120
+277%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−806%
163
+806%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1000%
400−450
+1000%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−700%
190−200
+700%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−335%
113
+335%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−440%
130−140
+440%
Valorant 35−40
−983%
350−400
+983%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−277%
110−120
+277%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−761%
155
+761%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−215%
123
+215%
Fortnite 55−60
−423%
290−300
+423%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1000%
400−450
+1000%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−700%
190−200
+700%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−308%
106
+308%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−191%
210−220
+191%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−440%
130−140
+440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−500%
170−180
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−983%
350−400
+983%
World of Tanks 130−140
−101%
270−280
+101%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−277%
110−120
+277%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−717%
147
+717%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 30−35
−665%
260−270
+665%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−251%
130−140
+251%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1000%
400−450
+1000%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−700%
190−200
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−191%
210−220
+191%
Valorant 35−40
−983%
350−400
+983%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−1083%
140−150
+1083%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−992%
140−150
+992%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
−195%
160−170
+195%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1063%
90−95
+1063%
World of Tanks 65−70
−659%
500−550
+659%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−383%
85−90
+383%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−700%
160−170
+700%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1224%
270−280
+1224%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−929%
140−150
+929%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−450%
99
+450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1585%
219
+1585%
Valorant 24−27
−1288%
300−350
+1288%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%
Dota 2 20−22
−725%
160−170
+725%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−725%
160−170
+725%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2150%
90
+2150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−646%
200−210
+646%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−967%
60−65
+967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−730%
160−170
+730%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−1038%
90−95
+1038%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Dota 2 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−855%
100−110
+855%
Fortnite 10−11
−860%
95−100
+860%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1167%
150−160
+1167%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Valorant 9−10
−2044%
190−200
+2044%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how R9 M485X and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 692% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 789% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 721% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 2533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 55 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.43 72.65
Recency 15 May 2016 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

R9 M485X has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 670.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 104 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.