Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R9 M485X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M485X with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 M485X
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.09

T1200 Mobile outperforms R9 M485X by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking519347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7973.95
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAmethystTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed723 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate92.5491.20
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs12864
L1 Cache512 KB1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−93.3%
58
+93.3%
1440p16−18
−106%
33
+106%
4K40−45
−103%
81
+103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−83.7%
90−95
+83.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−80.5%
70−75
+80.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−83.7%
90−95
+83.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−117%
65
+117%
Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−80%
70−75
+80%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−100%
65−70
+100%
Valorant 90−95
−52.2%
130−140
+52.2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−80.5%
70−75
+80.5%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−83.7%
90−95
+83.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−56.7%
220−230
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−70.1%
114
+70.1%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−96.7%
59
+96.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−80%
70−75
+80%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−109%
71
+109%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−100%
65−70
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−196%
71
+196%
Valorant 90−95
−52.2%
130−140
+52.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−80.5%
70−75
+80.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Dota 2 65−70
−59.7%
107
+59.7%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−86.7%
56
+86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−80%
70−75
+80%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−100%
65−70
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
Valorant 90−95
−88.9%
170−180
+88.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−84.3%
120−130
+84.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−208%
37
+208%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
Valorant 100−110
−66.7%
170−180
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−116%
41
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−100%
40−45
+100%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−60%
30−35
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Valorant 45−50
−106%
95−100
+106%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−136%
24−27
+136%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 30−35
−221%
109
+221%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%

1440p
High

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how R9 M485X and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 93% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 106% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 221% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile performs better in 50 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.09 17.33
Recency 15 May 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

R9 M485X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 90.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1288.9% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 160 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M485X or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.