A100 SXM4 vs Radeon R9 M485X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameAmethystGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486912
Core clock speed723 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54609.1
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs128432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache512 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount8 GB40 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 400 Watt

R9 M485X has 60% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M485X and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M485X or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.