Radeon E8950 vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.59
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGA100Amethyst
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)29 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores69122048
Core clock speed1410 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate609.1128.0
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs16032
TMUs432128
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache40 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount40 GB8 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 29 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 95 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon E8950, on the other hand, has 321% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon E8950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon E8950 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or Radeon E8950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.