Quadro M600M vs Radeon R9 M470

Aggregated performance score

R9 M470
2016
4 GB GDDR5
6.02
+6.9%

Radeon R9 M470 outperforms Quadro M600M by a small 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking552565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.21
ArchitectureGCN 2 (2016)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameSaturnGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date14 May 2016 (8 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current priceno data$103

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed1000 MHz837 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0014.02
Floating-point performance1,536 gflops863.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M470 and Quadro M600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.35.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M470 6.02
+6.9%
Quadro M600M 5.63

Radeon R9 M470 outperforms Quadro M600M by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M470 2330
+7%
Quadro M600M 2177

Radeon R9 M470 outperforms Quadro M600M by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M470 3655
+50.4%
Quadro M600M 2430

Radeon R9 M470 outperforms Quadro M600M by 50% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M470 24365
+31.8%
Quadro M600M 18491

Radeon R9 M470 outperforms Quadro M600M by 32% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+50%
8
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R9 M470 and Quadro M600M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M470 is 6% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M470 is 50% faster than the Quadro M600M.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M600M is 17% faster than the R9 M470.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M470 is ahead in 42 tests (65%)
  • Quadro M600M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.02 5.63
Recency 14 May 2016 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M470 and Quadro M600M.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M470 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M470
Radeon R9 M470
NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Quadro M600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Quadro M600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.