Quadro M600M vs Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
E8950 R9 M295X R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M390X R9 M395X R9 M395X Mac Edition R9 M485X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K620M K2200M M500M M520 M600M M620 M1000M M1200 M2000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition with Quadro M600M, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X Mac Edition
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
12.35
+130%

R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms M600M by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8013.78
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameAmethystGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)18 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed850 MHz837 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate108.814.02
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPS0.6728 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12816
L1 Cache512 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1362 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth174.3 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
+106%
17
−106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how R9 M295X Mac Edition and Quadro M600M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X Mac Edition is 106% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.35 5.37
Recency 23 November 2014 18 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 30 Watt

R9 M295X Mac Edition has a 130% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro M600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 733% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M600M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
vs
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
R9 M295X Mac Edition Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
R9 M270X R9 M270X
vs
R6 Graphics R6 Graphics
R9 M270X R9 M270X
vs
ATI HD 3450 X2 HD 3450 X2
R9 M270X R9 M270X
vs
R5 A240 R5 A240
R9 M270X R9 M270X
vs
Playstation 5 GPU Playstation 5 GPU
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
GTX 960M GTX 960M
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
R7 M270 R7 M270
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
GTX 760 GTX 760
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
9200M GS 9200M GS
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Go 7400 Go 7400
R9 M295X Mac Edition R9 M295X Mac Edition
vs
Go 7300 Go 7300

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 6 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 27 votes

Rate Quadro M600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition or Quadro M600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.