Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs R9 M395X

Place in performance ranking	354	389
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	5.41
Architecture	GCN 3 (2014−2016)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	Amethyst XT	Polaris 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2014 (9 years ago)	5 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price	no data	$520

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1172 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1275 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	60-80 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	81.60
Floating-point performance	2,961 gflops	2,611 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M395X and Radeon RX 560X Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	92.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	+
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.0
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395X 13.41
+21%

RX 560X Mobile 11.08

R9 M395X outperforms RX 560X Mobile by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M395X 7921
+25.2%

RX 560X Mobile 6329

R9 M395X outperforms RX 560X Mobile by 25% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

40−45
+14.3%

−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−9.5%

23
+9.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +12%	25 −12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −36.4%	30 +36.4%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −13%	52 +13%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −11.4%	39 +11.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −8.3%	39 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −10.6%	52 +10.6%
Hitman 3	35−40 −8.3%	39 +8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +3.7%	27 −3.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −16%	29 +16%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +33.3%	21 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +4.8%	21 −4.8%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +4.5%	44 −4.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +40%	15 −40%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −2.9%	36 +2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +0%	36 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −4.3%	49 +4.3%
Hitman 3	35−40 +5.9%	34 −5.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +21.7%	21−24 −21.7%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +5%	20 −5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +21.1%	18−20 −21.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +12%	25 −12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −28.6%	36 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +0%	25 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +75%	16 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +17.9%	39 −17.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +61.5%	13 −61.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +6.1%	33 −6.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +9.1%	33 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +23.7%	38 −23.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +27.3%	22 −27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +127%	11 −127%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +25%	16−18 −25%
Hitman 3	21−24 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +11.8%	16−18 −11.8%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +26.3%	18−20 −26.3%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Battlefield 5	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

This is how R9 M395X and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

R9 M395X is 14.3% faster than RX 560X Mobile in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M395X is 127% faster than the RX 560X Mobile.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 36.4% faster than the R9 M395X.

All in all, in popular games: