Arc A380 vs Radeon R9 M395X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395X with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395X
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
13.45

Arc A380 outperforms R9 M395X by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking357175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.21
ArchitectureGCN 3 (2014−2016)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAmethyst XTDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 October 2014 (9 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed723 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54131.2
Floating-point performance2,961 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M395X and Arc A380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Eyefinity1no data
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395X 13.45
Arc A380 29.74
+121%

Arc A380 outperforms Radeon R9 M395X by 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M395X 5194
Arc A380 6238
+20.1%

Arc A380 outperforms Radeon R9 M395X by 20% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M395X 7921
Arc A380 10174
+28.4%

Arc A380 outperforms Radeon R9 M395X by 28% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−150%
45
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−114%
45−50
+114%
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11 no data
Hitman 3 9−10 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 no data

This is how R9 M395X and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.45 29.74
Recency 16 October 2014 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395X is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 741 vote

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.