Radeon RX 9060 XT vs R9 M395

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395 with Radeon RX 9060 XT, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395
2015
4 GB GDDR5
11.63

RX 9060 XT outperforms R9 M395 by a whopping 307% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking43074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.93
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 June 2015 (10 years ago)18 May 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922048
Core clock speed834 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3230 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data413.4
Floating-point processing powerno data26.46 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.2
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M395 11.63
RX 9060 XT 47.30
+307%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395 4929
RX 9060 XT 20042
+307%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Fortnite 70−75
−300%
280−290
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−292%
200−210
+292%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−305%
150−160
+305%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
Valorant 100−110
−277%
400−450
+277%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−294%
260−270
+294%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−280%
650−700
+280%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Dota 2 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Fortnite 70−75
−300%
280−290
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−292%
200−210
+292%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−305%
150−160
+305%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−300%
180−190
+300%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−296%
95−100
+296%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Valorant 100−110
−277%
400−450
+277%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Dead Island 2 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Dota 2 80−85
−270%
300−310
+270%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−285%
150−160
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−292%
200−210
+292%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Valorant 100−110
−277%
400−450
+277%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−300%
280−290
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−289%
350−400
+289%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−293%
55−60
+293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−257%
300−310
+257%
Valorant 130−140
−285%
500−550
+285%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Dead Island 2 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Valorant 60−65
−306%
260−270
+306%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Dead Island 2 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Dota 2 40−45
−286%
170−180
+286%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 47.30
Recency 9 June 2015 18 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT has a 306.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M395
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT
Radeon RX 9060 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 230 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M395 or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.