GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 8060S

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 8060S
2025
40.78
+83%

RX 8060S outperforms RTX 3050 Mobile by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking104262
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Power efficiencyno data21.35
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores402048
Core clock speedno data712 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1057 MHz
Manufacturing process technologyno data8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data67.65
Floating-point processing powerno data4.329 TFLOPS
ROPsno data40
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 8060S 40.78
+83%
RTX 3050 Mobile 22.28

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 8060S 40164
+88.1%
RTX 3050 Mobile 21358

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 8060S 92510
+19.8%
RTX 3050 Mobile 77234

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 8060S 26826
+71%
RTX 3050 Mobile 15685

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 8060S 148182
+64.2%
RTX 3050 Mobile 90224

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD106
+14%
93
−14%
1440p50
−2%
51
+2%
4K36
+12.5%
32
−12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+77.2%
120−130
−77.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−12.8%
106
+12.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+9.2%
87
−9.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+50%
90−95
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+69.3%
120−130
−69.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+13.3%
83
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 96
−22.9%
118
+22.9%
Fortnite 170−180
+54.5%
110−120
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+74.2%
85−90
−74.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+14.8%
108
−14.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+41.8%
67
−41.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+82.6%
85−90
−82.6%
Valorant 230−240
+47.8%
150−160
−47.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+50%
90−95
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 109
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+11.6%
240−250
−11.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+54.1%
61
−54.1%
Far Cry 5 95
−12.6%
107
+12.6%
Fortnite 170−180
+54.5%
110−120
−54.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+74.2%
85−90
−74.2%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+31.9%
94
−31.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
−2.4%
128
+2.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+79.2%
53
−79.2%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+56.5%
62
−56.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+82.6%
85−90
−82.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
−16.7%
168
+16.7%
Valorant 230−240
+47.8%
150−160
−47.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+50%
90−95
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
+54.1%
61
−54.1%
Far Cry 5 92
−7.6%
99
+7.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+74.2%
85−90
−74.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+126%
42
−126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+82.6%
85−90
−82.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+55.4%
65
−55.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+54.5%
110−120
−54.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+47.9%
45−50
−47.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+76.6%
150−160
−76.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+12.3%
57
−12.3%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+63.9%
36
−63.9%
Valorant 260−270
+33.7%
190−200
−33.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+64.5%
60−65
−64.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+56.7%
30
−56.7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+44.1%
68
−44.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+104%
55−60
−104%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+65.5%
29
−65.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+111%
35−40
−111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+106%
50−55
−106%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 73
+28.1%
57
−28.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+60.9%
23
−60.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+47.7%
44
−47.7%
Valorant 240−250
+89.1%
120−130
−89.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+88.2%
30−35
−88.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+83.3%
12
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+54.3%
35
−54.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+97.4%
35−40
−97.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+73.3%
15
−73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+121%
24−27
−121%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 169
+0%
169
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%

This is how RX 8060S and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 8060S is 14% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 8060S is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 8060S is 143% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 23% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 8060S is ahead in 53 tests (80%)
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 7 tests (11%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.78 22.28
Recency 6 January 2025 11 May 2021

RX 8060S has a 83% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 years.

The Radeon RX 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 5025 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.