GeForce RTX 5080 vs Radeon R9 M395

Place in the ranking	396	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	36.63
Power efficiency	no data	16.27
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	no data	GB203
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 June 2015 (9 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	10752
Core clock speed	834 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2617 MHz
Number of transistors	5000 Million	45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	360 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	879.3
Floating-point processing power	no data	56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	128
TMUs	no data	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.4
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	10.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395 12.79

RTX 5080 85.08
+565%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395 4915

RTX 5080 32698
+565%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −543%	270−280 +543%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −536%	210−220 +536%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −557%	230−240 +557%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +967%	3−4 −967%
Valorant	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −543%	270−280 +543%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Dota 2	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Fortnite	70−75 −516%	450−500 +516%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −536%	210−220 +536%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −557%	230−240 +557%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +2275%	4−5 −2275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +967%	3−4 −967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +875%	4−5 −875%
Valorant	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%
World of Tanks	170−180 +2063%	8−9 −2063%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −543%	270−280 +543%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Dota 2	45−50 −552%	300−310 +552%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +880%	5−6 −880%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −536%	210−220 +536%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +2275%	4−5 −2275%
Valorant	50−55 −488%	300−310 +488%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −532%	550−600 +532%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
World of Tanks	90−95 −511%	550−600 +511%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −540%	160−170 +540%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −536%	70−75 +536%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −550%	65−70 +550%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +625%	4−5 −625%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −545%	200−210 +545%
Forza Horizon 5	20−22 −550%	130−140 +550%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −530%	170−180 +530%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −547%	110−120 +547%
Valorant	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Dota 2	21−24 +53.3%	14−16 −53.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −549%	240−250 +549%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −525%	50−55 +525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −525%	75−80 +525%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −500%	24−27 +500%
Dota 2	21−24 −552%	150−160 +552%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −525%	100−105 +525%
Fortnite	14−16 −543%	90−95 +543%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −511%	110−120 +511%
Forza Horizon 5	9−10 −511%	55−60 +511%
Valorant	12−14	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395 is 2275% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, R9 M395 surpassed RTX 5080 in all 17 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.79	85.08
Recency	9 June 2015	30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	4 nm

RTX 5080 has a 565.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.