Radeon RX 6700M vs R9 M390
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R9 M390 and Radeon RX 6700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6700M outperforms R9 M390 by a whopping 262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 468 | 149 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.90 |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | Pitcairn | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 31 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1489 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5000 Million | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 135 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 345.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 11.06 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 144 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 10 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| Eyefinity | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| Mantle | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 44
−175%
| 121
+175%
|
| 4K | 21
−257%
| 75−80
+257%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−318%
|
70−75
+318%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−289%
|
70−75
+289%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−216%
|
95−100
+216%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−318%
|
70−75
+318%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−126%
|
43
+126%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−432%
|
202
+432%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−231%
|
85−90
+231%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−285%
|
100
+285%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−441%
|
200
+441%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−216%
|
95−100
+216%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−318%
|
70−75
+318%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−78.9%
|
34
+78.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 22
−441%
|
119
+441%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−136%
|
90−95
+136%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
−184%
|
150−160
+184%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−389%
|
186
+389%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 34
−244%
|
117
+244%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
−231%
|
85−90
+231%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 75−80
−155%
|
190−200
+155%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27
−173%
|
70−75
+173%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33
−267%
|
120−130
+267%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−170%
|
100
+170%
|
| World of Tanks | 140−150
−98.6%
|
270−280
+98.6%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−216%
|
95−100
+216%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
−318%
|
70−75
+318%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
−47.4%
|
28
+47.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−229%
|
112
+229%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
−136%
|
90−95
+136%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−347%
|
170
+347%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 75−80
−155%
|
190−200
+155%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−373%
|
175
+373%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−433%
|
60−65
+433%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
−392%
|
60−65
+392%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
−289%
|
170−180
+289%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
−325%
|
30−35
+325%
|
| World of Tanks | 65−70
−225%
|
220−230
+225%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−272%
|
65−70
+272%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−525%
|
24−27
+525%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
−325%
|
30−35
+325%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−433%
|
110−120
+433%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−350%
|
95−100
+350%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
−287%
|
55−60
+287%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
−333%
|
75−80
+333%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−346%
|
55−60
+346%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−338%
|
100−110
+338%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| Dota 2 | 20−22
−235%
|
65−70
+235%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−235%
|
65−70
+235%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−480%
|
27−30
+480%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−300%
|
110−120
+300%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−267%
|
21−24
+267%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−235%
|
65−70
+235%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
| Dota 2 | 20−22
−235%
|
65−70
+235%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−317%
|
50−55
+317%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
−380%
|
45−50
+380%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−375%
|
55−60
+375%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
−357%
|
30−35
+357%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−440%
|
50−55
+440%
|
This is how R9 M390 and RX 6700M compete in popular games:
- RX 6700M is 175% faster in 1080p
- RX 6700M is 257% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6700M is 525% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 6700M surpassed R9 M390 in all 64 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.29 | 33.67 |
| Recency | 9 June 2015 | 31 May 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 10 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
RX 6700M has a 262.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6700M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
