RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs Radeon R9 M390

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
9.91

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms R9 M390 by a whopping 807% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4593
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.77
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePitcairnAD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)5 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102414080
Core clock speedno data975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2460 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,082
Floating-point processing powerno data69.27 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−695%
350−400
+695%
4K21
−805%
190−200
+805%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Elden Ring 27−30
−793%
250−260
+793%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−806%
290−300
+806%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−785%
230−240
+785%
Valorant 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−806%
290−300
+806%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Dota 2 22
−764%
190−200
+764%
Elden Ring 27−30
−793%
250−260
+793%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−754%
350−400
+754%
Fortnite 55−60
−762%
500−550
+762%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
−782%
300−310
+782%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−789%
240−250
+789%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−744%
650−700
+744%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−785%
230−240
+785%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−779%
290−300
+779%
Valorant 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%
World of Tanks 140−150
−774%
1250−1300
+774%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−806%
290−300
+806%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Dota 2 35−40
−757%
300−310
+757%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−754%
350−400
+754%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−744%
650−700
+744%
Valorant 35−40
−711%
300−310
+711%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Elden Ring 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−751%
400−450
+751%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
World of Tanks 70−75
−745%
600−650
+745%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−805%
190−200
+805%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−764%
190−200
+764%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−795%
170−180
+795%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Valorant 24−27
−780%
220−230
+780%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Dota 2 20−22
−800%
180−190
+800%
Elden Ring 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−800%
180−190
+800%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−797%
260−270
+797%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−800%
180−190
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Dota 2 20−22
−800%
180−190
+800%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Fortnite 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Valorant 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%

This is how R9 M390 and RTX 5880 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 695% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 805% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 89.91
Recency 9 June 2015 5 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 5880 Ada Generation has a 807.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 19 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.