Quadro K1100M vs Radeon R9 M390

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 with Quadro K1100M, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
9.91
+250%

R9 M390 outperforms K1100M by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.09
Power efficiencyno data4.32
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePitcairnGK107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109.94

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speedno data706 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data22.59
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5422 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-+
Mantle+-
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M390 9.91
+250%
K1100M 2.83

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M390 6819
+273%
K1100M 1827

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+159%
17
−159%
4K21
+320%
5−6
−320%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.47
4Kno data21.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Elden Ring 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Valorant 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Dota 2 22
+214%
7−8
−214%
Elden Ring 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Fortnite 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
+325%
8−9
−325%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+196%
24−27
−196%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+267%
9
−267%
Valorant 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
World of Tanks 140−150
+180%
50−55
−180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Dota 2 35−40
+414%
7−8
−414%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+196%
24−27
−196%
Valorant 35−40
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Elden Ring 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+135%
20−22
−135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
World of Tanks 70−75
+274%
18−20
−274%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Valorant 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Elden Ring 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Fortnite 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Valorant 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

This is how R9 M390 and K1100M compete in popular games:

  • R9 M390 is 159% faster in 1080p
  • R9 M390 is 320% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M390 is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M390 is ahead in 57 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.91 2.83
Recency 9 June 2015 23 July 2013

R9 M390 has a 250.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 232 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.